Tangible or Electronic?

(Photo taken by me)


I’ve always been such a huge fan of holding an actual book. There’s something about the feel, the smell, those pages, and everything in between that sets the pulsating heart of a bookworm aflame.

Only over the past few years have I begun to dabble in ebooks, and while I agree that they’re unbelievably convenient, I still seem to shy away from them (which is a shame because our square footage is starting to be consumed by real live book books).

Today I turned back on the Kindle Fire after months of it collecting dust on my bookshelf. I started two different books that I’ve been meaning to get to: 1) Quarry’s List by Max Allan Collins and 2) Bond on Bond by the late, great Sir Roger Moore.

I have to say, this really is an enjoyable reading experience. I can flip back and forth between the two books on a whim and for some reason, I feel more compelled to keep going with both.

Moving forward, in order to stop the madness of purchasing so many books that take up space and accumulate to be very heavy in both weight and size, I may begin purchasing the ebook copy of something first. If I adore it and begin to obsess over the work once I’ve finished, then I might take the extra step to buy an actual copy, but only then.

Does anyone else struggle with the spacial proximity of their own book collection? Do you read read or e-read? Or both? I’m very curious, let me know your thoughts!


Searching for new reads?

Poetry about Strange Cars or maybe a fictional novel journal about a Dioramist protagonist who struggles with a passion for writing and a former love? Be sure to check out my published wares on Amazon if you’re interested.

Also, be sure to find me on Instagram @ blankpagesofmine and say hello!

6 thoughts on “Tangible or Electronic?

    1. I’m the same point, so it’s understandable. If space allowed, I’d just keep piling those physical books higher and higher 📚. Very cool! That was one of my favorite things growing up, being gifted or handed down books. For someone that age, it’s a portable machine into an alternate time and place, and that’s so special.

      Liked by 1 person

  1. I enjoy both: I just find them different reading experiences. With a paper book, we develop a sense of where we are in a tale based on the remaining width of the book we hold and we all tend to read a paper book I think with an eye subconsciously looking ahead at where we are on the two pages that are always visible. However an ebook lets us search inside easier and naturally a Kindle full of hundreds of books takes up less space in our carry on luggage (or on a shelf) than a single paperback.

    I’m also a re-reader. I usually read a book I’ve enjoyed at least twice. I find in a second read I always see stuff I missed or underappreciated in the first.😊

    Liked by 1 person

    1. That’s exactly what it is! That sense of completion when you see the back pages waning more and more. Kindle gives you a percentage or a page count, depending on your preference, but for some reason it always feels like a slower way of reading for me. A re-read is ideal! I’m the same way, it always helps to clarify parts of the story that may be hazy and to help the reader realize what was missed during the first run through.

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply to R. J. Nello Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s